道徳的相対主義 - 暇つぶしWikipedia

道徳的相対主義

□記事を途中から表示しています
[最初から表示]

^ Rorty, Richard (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press（英語版）. pp. 166?169. ISBN 0816610649. https://books.google.com/books?id=6L2Wkls7UnwC
^ a b Swoyer, Chris (2003年2月22日). “ ⇒Relativism”. 2010年5月10日閲覧。
^ “Relativism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2020年9月21日). 2020年12月13日閲覧。
^ a b c Gowans, Chris (15 October 2017). Zalta, Edward N.. ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/moral-relativism/
^ Witenberg, Rivka T.. “Tolerance is more than putting up with things ? it's a moral virtue” (英語). The Conversation. 2020年5月28日閲覧。
^ http://jetpress.org/v21/blackford3.htm の彼のレビューの終わりで
 ^ Gowans, Chris (2004-02-19). Moral Relativism. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/moral-relativism/#RelTol.
^ “Introduction to Utilitarianism ? Utilitarianism.net” (英語). Utilitarianism. 2022年4月14日閲覧。
^ Dundas, Paul (2002) p. 231
^ Koller, John M. (July, 2000) pp. 400?07
^ “Protagoras 。Greek philosopher” (英語). Encyclopedia Britannica. 2020年5月28日閲覧。
^ “Protagoras of Abdera: Of All Things Man Is The Measure”. World History Encyclopedia. 2020年5月28日閲覧。
^ Sextus Empiricus Outlines of Pyrrhonism Book III, Chapter 21
^ Kelley L. Ross (1999年). “ ⇒Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677)”. History of Philosophy As I See It. 2009年12月7日閲覧。
^ Smith, Douglas (2008). Friedrich Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 362?363
^ Spinks, Lee (2003). Friedrich Nietzsche. Florence, KY: Routledge. pp. 5. https://archive.org/details/friedrichnietzsc00spin
^ ブライアン・ライター「Nietzsche's Moral and Political Philosophy」 ⇒スタンフォード哲学百科事典の記事へのリンク
 ^ Joyce, Richard (2006). The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-10112-7. https://archive.org/details/evolutionofmoral00rich. "evolution of morality joyce."
^ Shermer, Michael (2004). “Transcendent Morality”. The Science of Good and Evil. ISBN 0-8050-7520-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=eevvWAcMBaAC&q=shermer+exegesis&pg=PA19. "Given this presupposition, it seems reasonable to be both a transcendentalist and an empiricist, or what I call a transcendent empiricist."
^ Stace, Walter T. (1975). The Concept of Morals. New York: The MacMillan Company. pp. 67. ISBN 0-8446-2990-1
^ Baghramian, Maria; Carter, J. Adam (2019), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Relativism (Winter 2019 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/relativism/ 2020年5月28日閲覧。
^ “Moral Relativism 。Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy”. www.iep.utm.edu. 2020年5月28日閲覧。
^ “Reasonable Doubts Podcast, Ibn Warraq interviews "Defending the West" and "What the Koran Really Says"”. 2009年11月18日時点の ⇒オリジナルよりアーカイブ。2023年6月9日閲覧。
^ “ ⇒Simon Blackburn on Moral Relativism”. philosophy bites. 2023年6月9日閲覧。
^ Blackburn, Simon (1998). ⇒“Review of Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1): 195?198. doi:10.2307/2653640. ISSN 0031-8205. JSTOR 2653640. ⇒http://www.jstor.org/stable/2653640.
^ Gowans, Chris (2015-01-01). Zalta, Edward N.. ed. ⇒Moral Relativism (Fall 2015 ed.). ⇒http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/moral-relativism/
^ ヨハネ・パウロ2世教皇著、マルチェッロ・ペラ（英語版）共著『根なしの現代西洋：相対主義、キリスト教、イスラム』（Basic Books, 2006. ISBN 0-465-00634-5）。
^ ビクク・ボディ（英語版）, "A Buddhist Response to Contemporary Dilemmas of Human Existence" ⇒Access to Insightの記事
^ a b Joyce, Richard (2016), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Moral Anti-Realism (Supplement on Moral Objectivity and Moral Relativism) (Winter 2016 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-anti-realism/moral-objectivity-relativism.html 2021年3月8日閲覧, "In short, the non-objectivism vs. objectivism and the relativism vs. absolutism polarities are orthogonal to each other, and it is the former pair that is usually taken to matter when it comes to characterizing anti-realism."
^ Harrison, Jonathan (2006). Borchert, Donald M.. ed. Encyclopedia of philosophy (2nd ed.). Detroit: Thomson Gale/Macmillan Reference USA. ISBN 0-02-865780-2. OCLC 61151356. https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/61151356. "A subjectivist ethical theorist is a theory according to which moral judgements about men or their actions are judgements about the way people react to these men and actions - that is, the way they think or feel about them."
^ a b Joyce, Richard (2016), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Moral Anti-Realism (Supplement on Moral Objectivity and Moral Relativism) (Winter 2016 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-anti-realism/moral-objectivity-relativism.html 2021年3月8日閲覧, "In all cases, it may be that what determines the difference in the relevant contexts is something “mind-dependent”?in which case it would be anti-realist relativism?but it need not be; perhaps what determines the relevant difference is an entirely mind-independent affair, making for an objectivist (and potentially realist) relativism."
^ Joyce, Richard (2016), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Moral Anti-Realism (Supplement on Moral Objectivity and Moral Relativism) (Winter 2016 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-anti-realism/moral-objectivity-relativism.html 2021年3月8日閲覧, "...the non-objectivist need not be a relativist. Suppose the moral facts depend on the attitudes or opinions of a particular group or individual (e.g., “X is good” means “Caesar approves of X,” or “The Supreme Court rules in favor of X,” etc.), and thus moral truth is an entirely mind-dependent affair. Since, in this case, all speakers' moral utterances are made true or false by the same mental activity, then this is not strictly speaking a version of relativism, but is, rather, a relation-designating account of moral terms (see Stevenson 1963: 74 for this distinction)."
^ a b c Joyce, Richard (2016), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Moral Anti-Realism (Supplement on Moral Objectivity and Moral Relativism) (Winter 2016 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-anti-realism/moral-objectivity-relativism.html 2021年3月8日閲覧, "In short, the non-objectivism vs. objectivism and the relativism vs. absolutism polarities are orthogonal to each other, and it is the former pair that is usually taken to matter when it comes to characterizing anti-realism. Moral relativism is sometimes thought of as a version of anti-realism, but (short of stipulating usage) there is no basis for this classification; it is better to say that some versions of relativism may be anti-realist and others may be realist."

次ページ

記事の検索

Size:74 KB
出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
担当:undef