科学的コンセンサス
□記事を途中から表示しています
[最初から表示]
^ Lynas, Mark; Houlton, Benjamin Z.; Perry, Simon (19 October 2021). “Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature”. Environmental Research Letters 16 (11): 114005. Bibcode: 2021ERL....16k4005L. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966.
^ “Scientists are from Mars, Laypeople are from Venus: An Evidence-Based Rationale for Communicating the Consensus on Climate”. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 34 (6). (November?December 2014). ⇒オリジナルの2017-02-07時点におけるアーカイブ。. https://web.archive.org/web/20170207164815/http://reports.ncse.com/index.php/rncse/article/viewFile/347/599 2018年4月12日閲覧。.
^ “The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence”. PLoS One 10 (2): e0118489. (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489. PMC 4340922. PMID 25714347. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340922/.
^ ⇒Major Gaps Between the Public, Scientists on Key Issues (Report). Pew Research Center. 1 July 2015.
^ Cook, John; Jacobs, Peter (2014). “Scientists are from Mars, Laypeople are from Venus: An Evidence-Based Rationale for Communicating the Consensus on Climate”. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 34 (6): 3.1. ⇒オリジナルの7 February 2017時点におけるアーカイブ。. https://web.archive.org/web/20170207164815/http://reports.ncse.com/index.php/rncse/article/viewFile/347/599 2016年7月10日閲覧。.
^ Hotchkiss, Michael (2015). “Emphasizing consensus about safety boosts support for vaccines”. Princeton University News. https://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S45/02/77M41/index.xml?section=topstories.
^ van der Linden, Sander; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Maibach, Edward (2016). “Climate Change's Unseen Consensus”. U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/opinion/knowledge-bank/articles/2016-02-18/teachers-need-to-communicate-the-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change.
^ Maibach, Ed; van der Linden, Sander (2016). “The importance of assessing and communicating scientific consensus”. Environmental Research Letters 11 (9): 0913003. Bibcode: 2016ERL....11i1003M. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/091003.
^ van der Linden, Sander; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Feinberg, Geoffrey; Maibach, Edward (2015). “The Scientific Consensus on Human-Caused Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence”. PLOS ONE 10 (2): e0118489. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489. PMC 4340922. PMID 25714347. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340922/.
^ Lewandowsky, Stephan; Gilles, Gignac; Vaughan, Samuel (2013). “The Pivotal Role of Perceived Scientific Consensus in Acceptance of Science”. Nature Climate Change 3 (4): 399?404. Bibcode: 2013NatCC...3..399L. doi:10.1038/nclimate1720.
^ van der Linden, Sander; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Feinberg, Geoffrey; Maibach, Edward (2015). “How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors?”. Climatic Change 126 (1?2): 255?262. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4.
^ a b c van der Linden, Sander; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Rosenthal, Seth; Maibach, Ed (2017). “Inoculating the Public Against Misinformation About Climate Change”. Global Challenges 1 (2): 1600008. doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008. PMC 6607159. PMID 31565263. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607159/.
^ Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich; Seifert, Colleen; Schwarz, Norbert; Cook, John (2012). “Misinformation and its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing”. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13 (3): 106?131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018. PMID 26173286.
^ Rosenberg, Paul. ⇒“Why climate deniers are winning: The twisted psychology that overwhelms scientific consensus”. Salon. ⇒http://www.salon.com/2014/04/19/why_climate_deniers_are_winning_the_twisted_psychology_that_overwhelms_scientific_consensus/.
^ Clarke, Chris; Dixon, Graham (2013). “Heightening uncertainty around certain science media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy.”. Science Communication 35 (3): 358?382. doi:10.1177/1075547012458290.
^ Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik (2010). Merchants of Doubt. Bloomsbury Press. ISBN 978-1-59691-610-4
^ Koehler, D (2016). “Can journalistic "false balance" distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion?”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 22 (1): 24?38. doi:10.1037/xap0000073. PMID 26752513. https://zenodo.org/record/889605.
^ Cook, J; Lewandowsky, S; Ecker, U (2017). “Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence”. PLOS ONE 12 (5): e0175799. Bibcode: 2017PLoSO..1275799C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799. PMC 5419564. PMID 28475576. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5419564/.
関連項目
反証可能性
合意形成
科学的方法
先行研究
パラダイム
境界科学
フリンジ理論
世界を騙しつづける科学者たち
偽の合意効果
多元的無知
オープンサイエンスデータ (英語版)
医学的コンセンサス
気候変動に関する科学的コンセンサス (英語版)
コンセンサスの現実 (英語版)
権威に訴える論証
経験論
マートンの科学規範 (英語版)
外部リンク
科学の健全な発展のために?誠実な科学者の心得?【テキスト版】 日本学術振興会
表
話
編
歴
科学技術研究
経済学
科学の経済学（英語版）
科学的知識の経済学（英語版）
歴史
科学の歴史と哲学（英語版）
科学史
科学技術史（英語版）
テクノロジー史
哲学
人新世
反実証主義（英語版）
次ページ記事の検索おまかせリスト▼オプションを表示暇つぶしWikipedia
Size:60 KB
出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
担当:undef