一元論 - 暇つぶしWikipedia

一元論

□記事を途中から表示しています
[最初から表示]

^ Cross, F.L.; Livingstone, E.A. (1974), The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, OUP, art. monism
^ .mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit;word-wrap:break-word}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation.cs-ja1 q,.mw-parser-output .citation.cs-ja2 q{quotes:"「""」""『""』"}.mw-parser-output .citation:target{background-color:rgba(0,127,255,0.133)}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;color:#d33}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{color:#d33}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#3a3;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit}Shields, Christopher. ⇒"Aristotle's Psychology". In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition).
^ Brugger, Walter (ed) (1972), Diccionario de Filosofia, Barcelona: Herder, art. dualismo, monismo, pluralismo
^ McInerny, Ralph; O'Callaghan, John (Summer 2018). “Saint Thomas Aquinas”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/aquinas/ 2018年11月7日閲覧。.
^ a b Brugger 1972.
^ a b Mandik 2010, p. 76.
^ ⇒Luke Mastin (2008),Monism
^ Sharma, Chandradhar (1962). “Chronological Summary of History of Indian Philosophy”. Indian Philosophy: A Critical Survey. New York: Barnes & Noble. p. vi
^ ⇒HYMN CXC. Creation.
^ Gnuse, Robert Karl (1 May 1997). No Other Gods: Emergent Monotheism in Israel. Sheffield Academic Press. p. 225. ISBN 1-85075-657-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=pBSJNDndGjwC&pg=PA225
^ Edward Roer (Translator), to Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad. Shankara's Introduction - Google ブックス
 ^ KN Jayatilleke (2010), Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge, ISBN 978-81-208-0619-1, p. 246?249, from note 385 onwards;
Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2217-5, p. 64; Quote: "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anatt?, Sanskrit: an?tman, the opposed doctrine of ?tman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence.";
Edward Roer (Translator), Shankara's Introduction - Google ブックス]
Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?, Philosophy Now;
John C. Plott et al. (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0158-5, p. 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any ?tman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism".
^ Edward Roer (Translator), Shankara's Introduction, p. 3, - Google ブックス to Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad at p. 3, OCLC 19373677
^ Paul Hacker, Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedanta (Editor: Wilhelm Halbfass), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2582-4, pp. 29?30
^ R. Blake Michael (1992), The Origins of V?ra?aiva Sects, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0776-1, pp. 60?62 with notes 6, 7 and 8
^ David Kalupahana, Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. The University Press of Hawaii, 1975, page 88. The passage is SN 2.77.
^ Verardi 1997, p. 323.
^ Conze 1967.
^ Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Clare Goodrick-Clarke G. R. S. Mead and the Gnostic Quest 2005 p. 8. Quote: "The idea that Gnosticism was derived from Buddhism was first postulated by Charles William King in his classic work, The Gnostics and their Remains (1864). He was one of the earliest and most emphatic scholars to propose the Gnostic debt to Buddhist thought."
^ H. L. Mansel, Gnostic Heresies of the First and Second Centuries (1875); p. 32
^ International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: E?J ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (1982). Quote: "Mansel ... summed up the principal sources of Gnosticism in these three: Platonism, the Persian religion, and the Buddhism of India." p. 490.
^ ブリタニカ・ジャパン 2021a, p. 「グノーシス派」.
^ 小学館 2021a, p. 「グノーシス派」.
^ 小学館 2021b, p. 「グノーシス」.
^ Hoeller 2012, p. 180.
^ ⇒Chapiter 2 of the Lessons In Tanya by Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi (1745-1812), founder of Chabad Chassidism (Free Translation).
^ William Schoedel, "Gnostic monism and the Gospel of Truth" in Bentley Layton (ed.) The Rediscovery of Gnosticism, Vol.1: The School of Valentinus, E.J. Brill, Leiden.
^ Levine, Michael, Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity, Psychology Press, 1994, ISBN 9780415070645, pgs 44, 274-275.

"The idea that Unity that is rooted in nature is what types of nature mysticism (e.g. Wordsworth, Robinson Jeffers, Gary Snyder) have in common with more philosophically robust versions of pantheism. It is why nature mysticism and philosophical pantheism are often conflated and confused for one another."

"[Wood's] pantheism is distant from Spinoza's identification of God with nature, and much closer to nature mysticism. In fact it is nature mysticism

"Nature mysticism, however, is as compatible with theism as it is with pantheism."

^ Spinoza’s Physical Theory, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-physics/
^ Donald Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd ed., 2001.
^ Max Velmans, Understanding Consciousness, 2000.

参考文献.mw-parser-output .refbegin{margin-bottom:0.5em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul{margin-left:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li{margin-left:0;padding-left:3.2em;text-indent:-3.2em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents ul,.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents ul li{list-style:none}@media(max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li{padding-left:1.6em;text-indent:-1.6em}}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-100{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns ul{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}

黒崎宏『言語ゲーム一元論―後期ウィトゲンシュタインの帰結』勁草書房、1997

宮元啓一『インドの「一元論哲学」を読む』春秋社、2008

Conze, Edward (1967), “Buddhism and Gnosis”, in Bianchi, U., Origins of Gnosticism: Colloquium of Messina, 13?18 April 1966

Conze, Edward (1975), “Buddhist prajna and Greek Sophia”, Religion 5 (2): 160?167, doi:10.1016/0048-721X(75)90017-2

Hoeller, Stephan A. (2012), Gnosticism: New Light on the Ancient Tradition of Inner Knowing, Quest Books

小学館「グノーシス派」『日本大百科全書(ニッポニカ)』小学館、コトバンク、2021a。日本大百科全書(ニッポニカ)『グノーシス派』 - コトバンク

次ページ

記事の検索

Size:69 KB
出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
担当:undef