アーサー・オンケン・ラヴジョイ
特に1908年に書かれたエッセイ “The Thirteen Pragmatisms“ がその例である [10]。
ウィリアム・F・バイナムは、40年後にラヴジョイの『存在の大いなる連鎖』を振り返り、その影響力の大きさと「活発」で継続的なセールスを評して「知的風景の見慣れた特徴 (a familiar feature of the intellectual landscape)」と表現した。 バイナムは、存在の大いなる連鎖の概念がどのように置き換えられたかについてはさらに多くの研究が必要であると主張しているが、ラヴジョイが言うように「啓蒙主義の存在の連鎖が解体された」18世紀末が重要な時期であることには同意している[11]。
高山宏の整理によれば、ラヴジョイは、エリザベス・シューエルとともに、英米圏においてミシェル・セールの役割（文学と科学を対立しない形で論じた）を果たした人物である。
著書
⇒Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity, (1935). (with George Boas). Johns Hopkins U. Press. 1997 edition: .mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit;word-wrap:break-word}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation.cs-ja1 q,.mw-parser-output .citation.cs-ja2 q{quotes:"「""」""『""』"}.mw-parser-output .citation:target{background-color:rgba(0,127,255,0.133)}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;color:#d33}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{color:#d33}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#3a3;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit}ISBN 0-8018-5611-6
The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (1936). Harvard University Press. Reprinted by Harper & Row, ISBN 0-674-36150-4, 2005 paperback: ISBN 0-674-36153-9
『存在の大いなる連鎖』内藤健二訳（晶文社、1975年）ISBN 9784794923400
『存在の大いなる連鎖』内藤健二訳（ちくま学芸文庫、2013年）ISBN 9784480095367
Essays in the History of Ideas (1948). Johns Hopkins U. Press
『観念の歴史』鈴木信雄ほか訳（名古屋大学出版会、2003年）ISBN 9784815804602
The Revolt Against Dualism (1960). Open Court Publishing. ISBN 0-87548-107-8
The Reason, the Understanding, and Time (1961). Johns Hopkins U. Press. ISBN 0-8018-0393-4
Reflections on Human Nature (1961). Johns Hopkins U. Press. ISBN 0-8018-0395-0
『人間本性考』鈴木信雄、市岡義章、佐々木光俊訳（名古屋大学出版会、1998年）
The Thirteen Pragmatisms and Other Essays (1963). Johns Hopkins U. Press. ISBN 0-8018-0396-9
雑誌論文・記事
"The Entangling Alliance of Religion and History," The Hibbert Journal, Vol. V, October 1906/ July 1907.
"The Desires of the Self-Conscious," The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, Vol. 4, No. 2, Jan. 17, 1907.
"The Place of Linnaeus in the History of Science," The Popular Science Monthly, Vol. LXXI, 1907.
"The Origins of Ethical Inwardness in Jewish Thought," The American Journal of Theology, Vol. XI, 1907.
"Kant and the English Platonists." In Essays, Philosophical and Psychological, Longmans, Green & Co., 1908.
"Pragmatism and Theology," The American Journal of Theology, Vol. XII, 1908.
"The Theory of a Pre-Christian Cult of Jesus," The Monist, Vol. XVIII, No. 4, October 1908.
"The Thirteen Pragmatisms," The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, Vol. V, January/December, 1908.
"The Argument for Organic Evolution Before the 'Origin of Species'," Part II, Popular Science Monthly, Vol. LXXV, July/December, 1909.
"Schopenhauer as an Evolutionist," The Monist, Vol. XXI, 1911.
"Kant and Evolution," Popular Science Monthly, Vol. LXXVII, 1910; Part II, Popular Science Monthly, Vol. LXXVIII, 1911.
"The Problem of Time in Recent French Philosophy," Part II, Part III, The Philosophical Review, Vol. XXI, 1912.
"Relativity, Reality, and Contradiction", The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1914.
"Pragmatism Versus the Pragmatist." In: Essays in Critical Realism. London: Macmillan & Co., 1920.
"Professional Ethics and Social Progress," The North American Review, March 1924.
"The Dialectical Argument Against Absolute Simultaneity", The Journal of Philosophy, 1930.
"Plans for the Future," Free World, November 1943.
その他
"Leibnitz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr Von," A Cyclopedia of Education, ed. by Paul Monroe, The Macmillan Company, 1911.
"The Unity of Science," The University of Missouri Bulletin: Science Series, Vol. I, N°. 1, January 1912.
Bergson & Romantic Evolutionism; Two Lectures Delivered Before the Union, September 5 & 12, 1913, University of California Press, 1914.
脚注^ Simo Knuuttila (ed.) Reforging the Great Chain of Being: Studies of the History of Modal Theories, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013 p.3
^ Reese, William (1996). Dictionary of philosophy and religion: Eastern and Western thought. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press. p. 428. ISBN 0391038648. OCLC 33983842
^ “Arthur O. Lovejoy”. Johns Hopkins University. 2020年11月16日閲覧。 “Lovejoy studied at Harvard under William James and Josiah Royce, the empiricist and idealist antipodes of turn of the century American philosophy. Though his philosophical sympathies were closer to James’, Lovejoy carried out a sustained critique of pragmatism that reverberates to this day.”
^ Feuer, Lewis S. (1977). “Arthur O. Lovejoy”. The American Scholar 46 (3): 358?366.
^ Sidney Axinn, "Wiener, Philip Paul (1905-92)", in: John R. Shook, ed., Dictionary Of Modern American Philosophers, Bristol: Thoemmes, 2005. Retrieved 17 July 2005.
^ Arthur O. Lovejoy, [The Great Chain of Being,] (1936) Harper & Row 1960 pp.5ff.
^ Sevick, Charles E. (1936). The Development of a Perceptual Realism. University of Wisconsin-Madison. p. 51. "Lovejoy retains what is essentially the view of space and time of nineteenth Century physics, and has been a vigorous opponent of the theory of relativity."
^ Pace, Edward Aloysius; Ryan, James Hugh. (1931). The New Scholasticism. American Catholic Philosophical Association. p. 87, p. 185
^ Turner, Dean; Hazelett, Richard. (1979). The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers. Hope Publishing House. pp. 4-5. ISBN 9781932717051
^ "The Thirteen Pragmatisms, The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, nowThe Journal of Philosophy, Part I, 2 January 1908 p. 5-12. Part II, 16 January 1908, p. 29-39
^ William F. Bynum: "The Great Chain of Being after Forty Years: An Appraisal", History of Science 13 (1975): 1-28
参考文献
Campbell, James, "Arthur Lovejoy and the Progress of Philosophy,", in: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Vol. 39, No. 4, Fall, 2003.
Diggins, John P., "Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Challenge of Intellectual History,", in: Journal of the History of Ideas, Volume 67, Number 1, January 2006.
Duffin, Kathleen E. "Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Emergence of Novelty," in: Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 41, No. 2, Apr./Jun., 1980.
Feuer, Lewis S., "The Philosophical Method of Arthur O. Lovejoy: Critical Realism and Psychoanalytical Realism," in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, Jun., 1963.
Feuer, Lewis S. "Arthur O. Lovejoy," in: The American Scholar, Vol. 46, No. 3, Summer 1977.
Mandelbaum, Maurice. "Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Theory of Historiography," in: Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 9, No. 4, Oct., 1948.
Moran, Sean Farrell, "A.O. Lovejoy", in: Kelly Boyd, ed., The Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing, Routledge, 1999.
次ページ記事の検索おまかせリスト▼オプションを表示暇つぶしWikipedia
Size:23 KB
出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
担当:undef